What the law says is simply what a lawmaker, together with like-minded people, says that it says; there ought to be a distinction between the law, which is akin to some transcendental or metaphysical notion, and legislation which, more than often, though not always, is but the creation of the shallow and corrupt mind of a despicable creature who has managed to get elected for reasons that had better be left unmentioned.

Those superlative morons who hold that the law exists to prevent crime are unable to understand that it is the law itself that verily creates crime, by criminalising an action or behaviour.

There is an abyss that separates the law from what it's supposed to be, but some people will say that "the law is the law", whatever that may mean and regardless of the scandalous nature of so many laws the finality of which is not to protect, except verbally only, but to oppress.

The intelligent and the virtuous do not need laws; knaves and rascals do.

It is never, in a court of justice, easy to identify the criminal himself/herself.

Not everyone thinks of his/her interest, of what is advantageous to him/her first, but only those who are shamelessly or innocently evil.